Thursday, November 29, 2007
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Rothschildian Revenge Against Joe Kennedy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_P._Kennedy,_Jr.
JFK was also supposed to die in the Pacific. Understand that the banker's finance the "good guys" and the "bad guys". This understood it is quite conceivable that JFK could have been set up by the "good guys" to be in the wrong place at the wrongtime so the "bad guys" operating under their banker instructions can complete the job. The ramming of Kennedy's PT-109 is a prime example. Was it really an accident in the Pacific or a banker hit against another son of Joe Kennedy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_destroyer_Amagiri#John_F._Kennedy_and_the_PT-109
Joseph Kennedy was neutralized with a series of strokes just months after JFK inauguration. He was rendered paralyzed and mute. He was purposely not killed. His enemies wanted him to witness in silence the murder of his sons. Who knows if he was aware that he and his family were victims of the bankers' masonic retaliation?
How Joseph Kennedy learned about Banker-created Wars
Joseph Kennedy, Bootlegger & Silent Partner to Bronfman
Note: Tibor Rosenbaum, Louis Bloomfield, Permindex
Frederick Warburg & Federal Reserve Ownership
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Who Owns the Federal Reserve?
Did the Owners of the Fed Arrange Kennedy's Assassination?
Monday, November 26, 2007
Sunday, November 25, 2007
www.terrorism-illuminati.com
http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/book/total_war.html
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
Frederick Warburg Photo As Young Man
Frederick Warburg Child Photo
Frederick's power and importance in U.S. politics has eluded the masses. John J. McCloy, the "Chairman of the American Establishment" of the fifties reported to Frederick Warburg. McCloy's mother cut Warburg's hair as a child.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/sitbv3/reader?asin=0679743596&pageID=S020&checkSum=
8Va7jWX0RN8DHCQ05S2bgkT0P0cDt0bL66HNlxD2jug=
GoogleSearch #1: Frederick M. Warburg
excerpt:
Prescott Bush's American Ship and Commerce Corp. notified Max Warburg of Hamburg, Germany, on March 7, 1933, that Warburg was to be the corporation's official, designated representative on the board of Hamburg-Amerika.
Max Warburg replied on March 27, 1933, assuring his American sponsors that the Hitler government was good for Germany: ‘For the last few years business was considerably better than we had anticipated, but a reaction is making itself felt for some months. We are actually suffering also under the very active propaganda against Germany, caused by some unpleasant circumstances. These occurrences were the natural consequence of the very excited election campaign, but were extraordinarily exaggerated in the foreign press. The Government is firmly resolved to maintain public peace and order in Germany, and I feel perfectly convinced in this respect that there is no cause for any alarm whatsoever.’
This seal of approval for Hitler, coming from a famous Jew, was just what Harriman and Bush required, for they anticipated rather serious ‘alarm’ inside the U.S.A. against their Nazi operations.
On March 29, 1933, two days after Max's letter to Harriman, Max's son, Erich Warburg, sent a cable to his cousin Frederick M. Warburg, a director of the Harriman railroad system. He asked Frederick to ‘use all your influence’ to stop all anti-Nazi activity in America, including ‘atrocity news and unfriendly propaganda in foreign press, mass meetings, etc.’ Frederick cabled back to Erich: ‘No responsible groups here [are] urging [a] boycott [of] German goods [,] merely excited individuals.’ Two days after that, on March 31, 1933, the American-Jewish Committee, controlled by the Warburgs, and the B'nai B'rith, heavily influenced by the Sulzbergers (New York Times), issued a formal, official joint statement of the two organizations, counseling ‘that no American boycott against Germany be encouraged,’ and advising ‘that no further mass meetings be held or similar forms of agitation be employed.’
The American Jewish Committee and the B'nai B'rith (mother of the Anti-Defamation League) continued with this hard-line, no-attack-on-Hitler stance all through the 1930s, blunting the fight mounted by many Jews and other anti-fascists.
Thus the decisive interchange reproduced above, taking place entirely within the orbit of the Harriman/Bush firm, may explain something of the relationship of George Bush to American Jewish and Zionist leaders. Some of them, in close cooperation with his family, played an ugly part in the drama of Nazism. Is this why ‘professional Nazi-hunters’ have never discovered how the Bush family made its money?”
This is astonishing information – no wonder such an intensive effort has always been made to suppress it. Doesn’t it all begin to become crystal clear? Isn’t ignorance absolute bliss? Let’s run down some of the implications here and see how they stack up to our current “New World Order.”
Also,
For a short bio on Freddy copy and paste the url below, then do find on "Warburg":
http://books.google.com/books?id=uzI79XfsOIwC&pg=PA1551&lpg=PA1551&dq=frederick+warburg&source=web&ots=UuZMAclH5I&sig=_6ptvrMdG5JgBshtfzhl4H7IYVI#PPA1492,M1
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Frederick Warburg & John J. McCloy
What role, if any, did Frederick M. Warburg and John J. McCloy have in the assassination and cover-up of President John F. Kennedy?
